Court denied motion to compel arbitration pending jury trial on the issue of whether the plaintiff consented to an arbitration agreement. Court reasoned there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff consented to an arbitration agreement and its authenticity, but denied the plaintiff’s arguments that the defendants had waived any existing right to arbitration or that the agreement was unconscionable because of its provisions for confidentiality, attorneys’ fees, limitations on discovery, and unilateral modification.-Folck v. Lennar Corporation (2018)
Links